Talk:Hiro/@comment-5431169-20180721231706

I am afraid I must note how wrong is his description when it comes to Love for Zero Two. I will cite the first paragraph alone:" Over time he develops and rekindles his feelings for Zero Two, eventually the two begin a short relationship before their demise". I believe it should be obvious that both words (develops and rekindles) are wrong in this context. Maybe "develops" could be used describing the childhood time, but even then was it Love? I am strongly opposed to the idea that the feelings they had then and after are the same, even though I can not comprehend how else I would explain the transition between their childhood feelings and their Love. You should probably use it in the past tense. But as for rekindles I believe it to be wrong since he never doused these feelings; they were always there, waiting to be re-discovered. To be honest the complexity of what was going on from the moment they met each other to the... moment they met each other(?!) can't be described by a single word of Love. I guess I am trying to say it was always there, never discovered and never quenched. It just... exists.

Please could you take another look at the paragraph and try to come up with something... not better, but better sounding? I am not trying to pressure or criticize, I simply believe there is more beautiful way to grasp and honour the idea.