Talk:Ikuno/@comment-34387361-20181205011811/@comment-33031677-20181209211022

For starters, this article is more than 7 years old and Vatican's point of view on the matter has significantly changed since then. Basically, it's no longer seen as evil as you describe. Let me for example quote the previous Pope: "sex is no longer a given element of nature, that man has to accept and personally make sense of: it is a social role that we choose for ourselves".

Now, to the refuting of your points: 1) The entire assumption is not true: it is not always derived of Lust. I'm pretty sure, you are familiar with the term "platonic love". Ikuno is the apparent representation of pure non-sexual love. (same goes for point 4)

2) Oh, man, you have no idea, how natural this is. Countless species of animals/vertebrates engage in that sort of sexual intercourse. There are numerous books and stories on the matter. Many other "deviations" are pretty common (e.g. Necrophilism)

3) That's quite a philosophical topic, which begs the question "what are they created for?". And who or what should one consider a creator? Parents, nature or else?

5) What is this law, and who has written it?

6) No, it's not. No matter where you try to look up, no dictionary limits the term to man-woman relationship.

7) Setting aside existential doubts, how do you know that? Yes, that is what is said in the article you presented. But it was written by men and where did they get that notion?

And while I DO sincerely appreciate that you - allegedly - do not discriminate homosexual individuals, I cannot justify you shoving your unwarranted and completely subjective opinion on such a controversial and important topic.